<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Introduction to RPR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aaronline.com/2010/08/an-introduction-to-rpr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aaronline.com/2010/08/an-introduction-to-rpr/</link>
	<description>Arizona&#039;s REALTOR® Association</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 20:21:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francces Flynn Thorsen</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronline.com/2010/08/an-introduction-to-rpr/comment-page-1/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>Francces Flynn Thorsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 20:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronline.com/?p=729#comment-549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kelley says, &quot;Did I mention free?  Yes, free.  And only available to members of the National Association of REALTORS®, of course.&quot;

This article does not mention the resale of MLS data ... creating AVM products and other third-party applications. RPR is NOT about collecting MLS data and giving FREE stuff to Realtors.  Will they throw bones to Realtors? I&#039;m sure they will.

Reggie Nicolay of RPR put together a great video demonstrating FREE reports to Realtors (latest bone). My guess about the next step with that little bone? Move.com (parent company of Realtor.com)  will take that data and create a better-than-ever CMA product for Top Producer (another Move.com company) that it will SELL to Realtors ... The PAID product will offer adjustments to value and other neat features not available with the FREE package everyone is hot and bothered about today.

What will RPR pay MLSs for that data? Nada. They&#039;re dispensing bones, not dollars.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kelley says, &#8220;Did I mention free?  Yes, free.  And only available to members of the National Association of REALTORS®, of course.&#8221;</p>
<p>This article does not mention the resale of MLS data &#8230; creating AVM products and other third-party applications. RPR is NOT about collecting MLS data and giving FREE stuff to Realtors.  Will they throw bones to Realtors? I&#8217;m sure they will.</p>
<p>Reggie Nicolay of RPR put together a great video demonstrating FREE reports to Realtors (latest bone). My guess about the next step with that little bone? Move.com (parent company of Realtor.com)  will take that data and create a better-than-ever CMA product for Top Producer (another Move.com company) that it will SELL to Realtors &#8230; The PAID product will offer adjustments to value and other neat features not available with the FREE package everyone is hot and bothered about today.</p>
<p>What will RPR pay MLSs for that data? Nada. They&#8217;re dispensing bones, not dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: REALTORS Property Resource &#8211; RPR &#8211; Goes Live in (Most of) Arizona</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronline.com/2010/08/an-introduction-to-rpr/comment-page-1/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>REALTORS Property Resource &#8211; RPR &#8211; Goes Live in (Most of) Arizona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronline.com/?p=729#comment-540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in August, Kelley Koehler wrote an article here on the AAR Blog, An Introduction to RPR. Kelley did a great job explaining the basics of RPR, which at the time of the writing was still in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in August, Kelley Koehler wrote an article here on the AAR Blog, An Introduction to RPR. Kelley did a great job explaining the basics of RPR, which at the time of the writing was still in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelley Koehler</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronline.com/2010/08/an-introduction-to-rpr/comment-page-1/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelley Koehler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 01:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronline.com/?p=729#comment-476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi El!  Thanks for commenting!

If you consider it, those are the same risks we have now.  The MLS is only as good as the data entry.  As are any online records.  RPR only takes that data and puts it in one place.  In the Tucson MLS, we can click on &#039;tax info&#039; for a property and it pulls up a record from CRS.  That CRS information is just an aggregate of other public records.  RPR does that same thing on a larger scale.

If you wanted to check the RPR data against the original public record or MLS, you certainly could.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi El!  Thanks for commenting!</p>
<p>If you consider it, those are the same risks we have now.  The MLS is only as good as the data entry.  As are any online records.  RPR only takes that data and puts it in one place.  In the Tucson MLS, we can click on &#8216;tax info&#8217; for a property and it pulls up a record from CRS.  That CRS information is just an aggregate of other public records.  RPR does that same thing on a larger scale.</p>
<p>If you wanted to check the RPR data against the original public record or MLS, you certainly could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Brant</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronline.com/2010/08/an-introduction-to-rpr/comment-page-1/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>El Brant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronline.com/?p=729#comment-472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s the thing... say this happens and all REALTORS® start relying on the data, but the data isn&#039;t accurate (poor data entry, failure to update records - whatever), and then we start seeing multiple lawsuits popping up for due diligence failure... then what?  Is it responsible or (even) appropriate for REALTORS® to rely on one source for all of their data?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the thing&#8230; say this happens and all REALTORS® start relying on the data, but the data isn&#8217;t accurate (poor data entry, failure to update records &#8211; whatever), and then we start seeing multiple lawsuits popping up for due diligence failure&#8230; then what?  Is it responsible or (even) appropriate for REALTORS® to rely on one source for all of their data?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelley Koehler</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronline.com/2010/08/an-introduction-to-rpr/comment-page-1/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelley Koehler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronline.com/?p=729#comment-456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hiya Ted!

R.com is from Move, not NAR.  Yeah, they outsourced it, but I wouldn&#039;t say they gave it to us directly.  And I&#039;m not going to go back how many decades and tell NAR that outsourcing was the wrong decision at the time.  It may have been the exact right one.  We just aren&#039;t fans anymore, but there&#039;s existing agreements and obligations to be honored.  My rumor mill says updates are coming.

And ironically, I just got back from a meeting of a NAR committee that I&#039;m on - and I&#039;m certainly not a 50-60 something.  There are changes afoot... have a little hope.  :)  It won&#039;t happen overnight, but it will happen - if those of us that desire change get involved and make it happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya Ted!</p>
<p>R.com is from Move, not NAR.  Yeah, they outsourced it, but I wouldn&#8217;t say they gave it to us directly.  And I&#8217;m not going to go back how many decades and tell NAR that outsourcing was the wrong decision at the time.  It may have been the exact right one.  We just aren&#8217;t fans anymore, but there&#8217;s existing agreements and obligations to be honored.  My rumor mill says updates are coming.</p>
<p>And ironically, I just got back from a meeting of a NAR committee that I&#8217;m on &#8211; and I&#8217;m certainly not a 50-60 something.  There are changes afoot&#8230; have a little hope.  <img src='http://blog.aaronline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   It won&#8217;t happen overnight, but it will happen &#8211; if those of us that desire change get involved and make it happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Mackel</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronline.com/2010/08/an-introduction-to-rpr/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Mackel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronline.com/?p=729#comment-455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NAR gave us REALTOR.com, probably the worst home search tool out there and left the door wide open for Zillow &amp; Redfin.

I don&#039;t hold much hope for anything cutting edge or functional.

If you have ever seen the &quot;Quick&quot; search screen on Tempo - So Cal MLS, that is the usual rubbish we get from software vendors and a realtor committee filled with 50-60 somethings. ;)

I could go down the list.  e-pro is a good example.  NAR approves these Programs and let&#039;s them run with the most outdated information.  No follow up or reviews of these programs from NAR.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NAR gave us REALTOR.com, probably the worst home search tool out there and left the door wide open for Zillow &amp; Redfin.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t hold much hope for anything cutting edge or functional.</p>
<p>If you have ever seen the &#8220;Quick&#8221; search screen on Tempo &#8211; So Cal MLS, that is the usual rubbish we get from software vendors and a realtor committee filled with 50-60 somethings. <img src='http://blog.aaronline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I could go down the list.  e-pro is a good example.  NAR approves these Programs and let&#8217;s them run with the most outdated information.  No follow up or reviews of these programs from NAR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention An Introduction to RPR -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronline.com/2010/08/an-introduction-to-rpr/comment-page-1/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention An Introduction to RPR -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronline.com/?p=729#comment-451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by NAR Info Central and Reggie Nicolay, Sage at AAR. Sage at AAR said: @housechick has a way of breaking down complex topics &amp; making them understandable. Here, she tackles RPR: http://bit.ly/deyDeD [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by NAR Info Central and Reggie Nicolay, Sage at AAR. Sage at AAR said: @housechick has a way of breaking down complex topics &amp; making them understandable. Here, she tackles RPR: <a href="http://bit.ly/deyDeD" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/deyDeD</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sage Dillon</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronline.com/2010/08/an-introduction-to-rpr/comment-page-1/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>Sage Dillon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronline.com/?p=729#comment-449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ulises, tell us more! :) What are your main concerns?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ulises, tell us more! <img src='http://blog.aaronline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  What are your main concerns?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ulises Romo</title>
		<link>http://blog.aaronline.com/2010/08/an-introduction-to-rpr/comment-page-1/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>Ulises Romo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aaronline.com/?p=729#comment-448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not sure about the RPR.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure about the RPR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
